Dec 18, 2023
Texas Senator Ted Cruz's past comments on anti-abortion legislation are spotlighted as he now cowardly attempts to flee any questioning over alarming Kate Cox Texas Supreme Court ruling. John Iadarola and Francesca Fiorentini break it down on The Damage Report.
- 5 minutes
Senator, are you supportive of the Texas
Supreme Court's ruling in a Kate Cox case
that prevented her from getting an
abortion after she learned her fetus was
not viable?
>> Speaker 2: Just call our press office.
>> Speaker 1: I actually have for
two days now, and
I still haven't received an answer.
>> Speaker 2: Thank you.
[00:00:15]
>> Speaker 2: [LAUGH]
>> You little wussy.
God, is he a little coward,
a little weenie, a little possum-faced,
craven, yellow bellied-
>> Keep running.
>> Slug of a human?
Just call my office, please, leave me
alone, I wanna get in this car and
[00:00:30]
not have to answer any questions.
I didn't run for
office to be asked my position on things
that I've been very
enthusiastic about in the past,
I did it to eventually get
a high price lobbying job.
So get out of my face, peasant journalist.
So that's Ted Cruz being asked, I think,
[00:00:48]
reasonable questions about why he suddenly
doesn't wanna say anything about abortion.
As Kate Cox, one of his constituents,
was run out of her home state,
she had to flee to actual civilization
outside of the borders of Texas.
[00:01:03]
And suddenly he doesn't
wanna say anything about it,
when he's been really enthusiastic,
as I said, talking about it before.
Here's what he had to say right
after Roe v Wade was overturned.
>> Speaker 4: The consequence is not that
abortion is suddenly illegal everywhere,
the consequence is it returns to
where it was the first 185 years
[00:01:21]
of our nation's history.
Which is elected legislatures
make that decision.
That means in bright blue states,
in states like New York and
California, at least for
the immediate, foreseeable future,
there will be no restrictions
whatsoever on abortion.
In redder states,
in states like my home state of Texas,
[00:01:38]
there will be significant and
meaningful restrictions, and
they'll vary state by state, reflecting
the values and mores of the citizens.
And if you disagree with
the particular rules where you live,
you can engage in the democratic process,
and
argue for what you think's right,
that's how our constitution set it up.
[00:01:58]
>> Speaker 2: Okay, so
what do you think is right, Ted?
You're talking about values and
mores, you mentioned consequences,
by the way, here are the consequences of
what this particular red state has set up.
Is this in line with your values,
your mores, or is it not, and
[00:02:17]
why are you so terrified to tell us?
Honestly, who are you terrified of,
are you terrified of turning off
people who think that this is insane?
Or do you actually think that it's
wrong and you're terrified of angering
[00:02:32]
the right wing by pointing out that
their policies are bat as crazy?
Who is it that you're so scared of, Ted?
Francesca, what do you think?
>> Speaker 5: I have so
many thoughts on this, but
it is incredible just how pie in the sky
and theoretical Ted Cruz likes to be.
[00:02:49]
And yes, the values and the mores,
and our democratic process, and
the constitution said that.
No, it didn't, again,
Roe v Wade established under
the constitution because of
the right to privacy, right?
That was the constitutional basis
that established Roe v Wade,
[00:03:07]
our right to privacy, our right to be
able to terminate a pregnancy when we
do not want to have children.
And yes, up until a certain week, right?
Always been the case under Roe v Wade,
always been the case.
And, yeah, the majority, 60% of people
who seek abortions, already parents.
[00:03:26]
In the case of Kate Cox, already a mom
of two, wants to be a mom of three.
Now, will have to, and has finally been
able to get the treatment that she
deserves instead of watching her baby
die in her arms as she was set up to do.
This story is wild, look,
the Internet loves to do this,
[00:03:45]
too, Twitter loves to do it,
all the people you argue with online,
we love to get into these
sort of hypotheticals.
Well, in truth, nobody provided the right
to an abortion, and when the founding
father, yeah, the founding fathers
were all dudes, all right?
[00:04:01]
They thought about their,
you know what, that's it.
But in practice, it means women bleeding
out in their cars from miscarriages,
it means, yeah,
people going to back alley abortions,
trying to induce abortions themselves,
right?
[00:04:17]
And horrifyingly burying
the fetus in their backyards,
I mean, this is disturbing stuff, right?
But again,
this is what happens when you restrict
people's right to have an abortion.
And final thought, John, Texas leads, I
think it's Florida and Texas, in line for
[00:04:34]
the least insured state in the country,
meaning people don't have health care.
So, already, Kate Cox is in a point of
privilege because she clearly was able
to see doctors who then, of course,
refused to treat her, but she had access.
[00:04:51]
Do you know how many
Kate Coxes there are and
will be in the state of Texas right now?
People whose stories we
will never hear about?
>> Speaker 2: Yeah, no,
that's a great point to make as well.
Yeah, utterly insane, no one can stand
there and say that what happened,
[00:05:08]
not hypothetical, what literally
happened should be acceptable.
So they are just not saying it,
they're continuing the same system,
they are guaranteeing that
there will be more Kate Coxes.
But none of them has the balls
to actually, say no.
[00:05:24]
This is, I just don't care,
I don't care about Kate Cox.
This is about ideology to me, I don't see
humans, I'm an ambitious sociopath and
perfectly fine with these
things happening again.
That's what they think,
they just won't say it.
[00:05:42]
Probably wise, wouldn't play well.
[MUSIC]
Now Playing (Clips)
Episode
Podcast
The Damage Report: December 18, 2023
Hosts: John Iadarola Guests: Francesca Fiorentini
- 5 minutes
- 5 minutes
- 3 minutes
- 5 minutes
- 5 minutes
- 7 minutes
- 16 minutes