May 15, 2026
Rep. Ro Khanna Weighs In On AOC
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she refuses to trust Marjorie Taylor Greene on issues related to Israel and Gaza.
- 14 minutes
So now we talked on the show about how Trump
has basically said that we're doing this war
for Israel and he added also for the Gulf countries,
but no mention of doing it for us. And because
that's largely indefensible and a person who
agrees with us on that is former Congresswoman
[00:00:17]
Marjorie Taylor Greene. She tweeted out, quote,
this is a quote from Trump, we are doing it
to help Israel. Now, she says, Trump says we
don't need to do it at all on attacking Iran.
You're paying a ridiculous gas prices for inflation,
inflation is rising. And we're evaporating
[00:00:33]
our weapons stockpiles, and he finally admitted
why. Wake up everyone, she says, and she
makes a good point. uh Trump even said in that
clip, we don't even need this war. So we are
doing it presumably only because Israel and
he claims the Gulf countries asked for it.
[00:00:51]
Now we know the Gulf countries did not ask for
they're very upset about it. But that's Marjorie
Taylor Greene fighting back on this. So, um
but interestingly, there's a battle within
progressive ranks and left wing ranks now.
Because some folks like uh Representative
[00:01:08]
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says, well, I don't
care if Marjorie Taylor Greene is saying the
right things or even voting the right way on
this issue. We still shouldn't work with her.
Here's her case for that. I care about results.
I care about results. Now there are certain
[00:01:24]
places where certain areas where I don't think.
should ignore some folks record on some of
these issues, right? It's about where we trust
intent, where we trust where those outcomes
are going. I personally do not trust someone
[00:01:45]
like Marjorie Taylor Greene, a proven bigot
and anti-Semite, on the issues of what is
good for Gazans and Israelis.
to align the left with white nationalists.
I don't think it serves us. And so I think
[00:02:07]
it's about looking at the context, the place,
the results, the outcomes, intentions, and
where we think that train would go. Yeah, so
Representative Canazan is uh guest host with
us today. And Roe, look, your voting record
and Representative Ocasio-Cortez's voting
[00:02:27]
record is very similar on this issue. I appreciate
her voting record on this. Largely there's
one area where she wasn't, or a couple areas
where she wasn't perfectly right, but I get
it. Overall, very good record on voting the
right way. But she says there that she cares
about results, but when you have Marjorie Taylor
Greene voting with you, isn't that results?
[00:02:50]
Well, let's look at the bigger uh principle.
Obviously, we shouldn't compromise an inch
when it comes to real progressive values. No
one is saying that we should throw the trans
community under the bus, throw the immigrant
community under the bus, throw women's rights
[00:03:06]
under the bus, throw black political rights
under the bus. And in my case, I never have,
I voted against Lake and Raleigh, I've uh voted
and supported the trans community even then
when other uh folks were. them under the bus
soon after Trump's election. But what I've
[00:03:22]
said is, if we can get folks to say that they're
going to help us stand up against war. If
we can get folks to say they're going to help
us stand up against an Epstein class that
is abusing the system and treating working class
girls as dispensable. Then I welcome their
[00:03:39]
support for progressive goals, for progressive
ideals. And that uh without their support,
we're not going to be effective, especially
when you have a conservative president. So
my view is pragmatism to achieve progressive
ends, not pragmatism to discard progressive
[00:03:59]
ideals. Yeah, so I'm to come back to results
in a second because she said one more thing
about uh a bill that she basically worked with
Ted Cruz on. So but let me ask you, she says
that she doesn't trust Marjorie Taylor Greene.
And she says she has presumably bad intent
[00:04:19]
since she questioned her intentions. uh So
I'll tell you my opinion, which is that uh
I don't really care about their intent at all.
I care about their votes, and I care what
they're telling the people that follow them
and believe in them. And Marjorie Taylor
[00:04:36]
Greene, Tucker Carlson, Tom Massey, so many
others seemingly have flipped. millions of
people on the right wing and independents to
say, yeah, we probably should care about American
sovereignty and not follow whatever everything
Israel says. And not fund everything they
[00:04:51]
want and not go into this disastrous war in
Iran. So um I don't really care what their
secret thoughts are, as long as what they're
actually saying and how they're influencing
people and how they're voting is going in the
right direction. Are we supposed to analyze
[00:05:10]
the secret intent of everyone we're voting together
with? I don't know if we can uh figure out
what lurks in a human being's heart. What
we can look at is what their actions are. And
there's no doubt that uh some of these individuals
have said uh terrible things in the past and
[00:05:31]
you can call them out for those things. But
in the case of the war in Iran, when Donald
Trump threatened to blow up the entire Iranian
civilization, basically threatened genocide
against Iran, threatened a war crime. And some
of our Democratic leaders were saying, well,
[00:05:48]
maybe you should consult Congress. You had people
like Marjorie Teller Greene and Tucker Carlson
saying that would be a war crime and genocide.
And there is uh absolutely no way that an
American president should do that. And for
us to say that we are a nation inspired by
[00:06:04]
Christianity. Well, If we're not going to recognize
that in this country, with Donald Trump as
president, that is helpful to those of us who
don't wanna see Iran blown up, who don't wanna
see our troops there, or Iranian schoolgirls
killed. Then we are not being effective in
[00:06:23]
stopping this war. And so what I would say
is, this is not about saying I'm gonna vote
for a certain person or I'm endorse a certain
person. It's about saying that when there are
huge issues with huge stakes, I'm going to
build a coalition that is actually going to
[00:06:41]
prevent war uh or hold, like I said, the Epstein
class accountable. Because we would never would
have gotten the Epstein bill through the line
if Marjorie Taylor Greene had enlisted her
seat and stood up to the president. That's
a fact, couldn't have done it, Massey couldn't
have done it without her, without Lauren Barber,
without Nancy Mace. Yeah, so it's not a little
[00:07:00]
thing, right? I mean, we've got- uh massively
important issues like the Epstein files, Iran
war, genocide. And it's not like they didn't
make a difference. If Massey hadn't joined
you, there's no way in the world you could have
gotten the Epstein files released. But you
[00:07:15]
also desperately needed Marjorie Taylor Greene,
Nancy Mace, and Lauren Boebert. And I disagree
with Massey on 91 % of stuff, that's kind of
literal. I disagree with Nancy Mace probably
and Lauren Boebert probably on 99 % of stuff.
But when they come over and give you the critical
votes you need on the Epstein files, You would
have been a little nuts to reject that, wouldn't
[00:07:36]
you? Well, it would have been disservice to
the survivors and it would not have uh gotten
transparency. Now I'm not out there uh defending
uh everything Marjatella Greene said. And if
I'm asked about it, I say I have very profound
disagreements and I understand why people feel
[00:07:55]
uh deeply hurt by commentaries made in the past
and I call those out. But uh It means that
where there are issues that uh we can have a
coalition to stop war, to hold the Epstein
[00:08:11]
class accountable, we should. And we also in
my view, this is maybe some people will
say I'm old fashioned or naive, but I believe
based on my upbringing and extending grace
and extending uh a sense that none of us are
perfect and people can have redemptive qualities.
[00:08:30]
And in my view, that's the best of the American
tradition, the conscience of our nation, in
my view, has been the black freedom struggle
in the South. And that was the attitude that
Dr. King took towards people who were segregationists.
That's the attitude John Lewis took to people
[00:08:48]
who beat him on the Edmund Pettus Bridge. There
has to be a sense of uh moral conviction uh
without uh writing off uh huge segments of the
American population. Yeah, last two things
here because ah that's a great point about Martin
Luther King. He actually would have of course
[00:09:07]
never gotten the Civil Rights Act or the Voting
Rights Act if he didn't work with Lyndon Johnson.
And Lyndon Johnson in private was viciously
racist. So if he said-. in public. And in
public oftentimes, that's right. So if he had
said no, I'm doing a purity test, I don't want
your Voting Rights Act, I don't want your Civil
Rights Act, it would have been a historic mistake.
[00:09:28]
So now and people like Tucker, he said terrible
things 20 years ago about Muslims. I grew up
Muslim. But now he says, my God, don't hate
Muslims. It's a terrible thing to hate Muslims.
And a good Christian should never hate Muslims.
Am I supposed to reject that guy on that issue?
[00:09:44]
No, that's crazy. But the last thing here is
uh one last part of that appearance from uh
Representative Ocasio-Cortez about how sometimes
it is okay to work with Republicans, which
was curious given what she said earlier. Let's
watch. I think it's really about what our outcomes
are. And to be honest, there are some areas
where things will not get done if they're
[00:10:03]
partisan because they are anti establishment.
There is bipartisan consensus on keeping
and protecting stock trading in Congress.
And so it's gonna require massive bipartisan
consensus of people willing to come together
across those differences to get it done. So
[00:10:23]
she worked with Ted Cruz on some of that. So
working with Ted Cruz is okay, does he have
good intent secretly? Or is it that the issue
is so important stock trading, which it is
very, very important issue that she's willing
to get past those problems. um But I would
[00:10:40]
argue genocide and war and the FC and files
are at least as important as stock trading.
um I would argue more important. So I can't
make heads or tails about when she thinks
it's okay to work based on results. and when
not to work on results. That's my opinion.
[00:10:58]
But what's your test for when to work with
a Republican and when not to? because I can't
seem to quite figure out hers. Well, first I
just want to be clear that Representative
Ocasio-Cortez, as I'm sure you would agree,
has been a very positive force overall in the
[00:11:14]
progressive movement and in the Congress. And
she generally has been a leader in uh banning
stock trading. She has worked across the aisle
on that. I support her bills, I support her
efforts, I support the Trust Act and she's absolutely
right. You need to build bipartisan consensus
[00:11:31]
to be able to do that. I guess what I would
say is when people are elected to the Congress
and they come there, that uh if they agree
on a goal that uh we believe is uh valuable
and the stakes matter, then we should work
with them. But we shouldn't work with them.
[00:11:50]
while compromising our values. So Marjorie Taylor
Greene had said, okay, Roe, uh I will sign
the Epstein Transparency Act. But you know what?
uh I need you at the press conference to have
anti-trans activists. Or I need you to have
uh people who are going to uh say that we
[00:12:05]
need to have a total unfettered Second Amendment,
but no uh gun uh safety laws. And Massey had
said, that's what I need, because I've got a
family that sends you a Christmas card with
everyone holding a semi-automatic weapon. I
said no, I'm not going to compromise on something
[00:12:21]
that fundamental. But if they're saying, look,
I'm willing to work with you on this issue,
then I think that we should work on those
common goals to be able to get things done.
Yeah, I just don't find it complicated. I'll
go further than you. somebody's going to vote
[00:12:41]
with me, I'm going to say yes, I just don't
find it complicated at all. But you're absolutely
right Ocasio-Cortez has uh voted the right way
on almost all the uh issues in regards to Israel
and certainly against the war. And I don't
want anybody getting the wrong idea. we're
[00:12:59]
discussing is not whether we, and Gero and
I have different opinions on this, uh but
whether we think Ocasio-Cortez's record is good
or not. What we're discussing is, how much
should we work with people from across the aisle
if they're willing to the aisle and let's also
[00:13:15]
note for the record because this is important.
They're doing it and in fact, Ro, I'll challenge
you a little bit on this. Because Marjorie
Taylor Greene and Tucker and all those guys
crossed the aisle to work with you guys when
they were in charge, when Trump and their party
and their side was in charge. And I would argue
that the Democrats did not do nearly enough
[00:13:36]
when Biden was in charge to oppose his funding
of what Israel had done in those years, including
the genocide. Well, I think it's fair. mean,
look, Massey and I had worked on a war powers
resolution to actually call out some of Trump's,
uh Biden's unilateral strikes on the Houthis.
[00:13:54]
One of the reasons Massey and I have this relationship
is we've uh done stood up against militarism
uh and unconstitutional militarism, whether
there was a Democrat or a Republican. And
we did call out Biden. And of course, there
were 37 of us who voted against the funding
[00:14:10]
to net me out who in while Biden was president,
but could we have done more? Absolutely, and
it's important to realize people say, well,
we appreciate your courage taking on the Epstein
class, taking on billionaires and the billionaire
tax. But the consequences I faced pale in comparison
[00:14:30]
to the consequences that Thomas Massey is facing
on Tuesday, where he has the entire presidential
apparatus against him, $35 million against him.
consequences Marjorie Taylor Green faced.
And that is not a subjective statement, that
is just a statement of fact. When you take
[00:14:48]
on your own party, the risk is much higher in
these issues. Yeah, and Tom Massey is going
to be on the Young Turks on Monday, so check
that out as well. uh
Now Playing (Clips)
Episode
Podcast
