Dec 16, 2025
Trump's Chief of Staff SNITCHES To Reporter About Staff
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles gave juicy details about the Trump administration to Vanity Fair.
- 21 minutes
Sometimes I am a conspiracy theorist,
but I only believe
in the conspiracy theories that are true.
It turns out that a conspiracy theory
is just something that was true
six months before the media admitted it.
There's actually some truth behind that.
But what Vice President J.D.
Vance was reacting to were comments
made about him by President Trump's
[00:00:20]
White House chief of staff.
Her name is Siouxsie Wiles,
if you're unfamiliar with her.
And apparently she granted Vanity Fair
Christopher Whipple,
specifically at Vanity Fair access
to her for months, and she did a series
of 11 interviews with her.
[00:00:36]
And in those interviews, she shared
her surprisingly candid views on various
members of the Trump administration.
Now, before we give you
the dirty, dirty details, Genk your $0.02.
Yeah, this was stunning
on a couple of grounds.
[00:00:52]
So first of all,
her admissions were amazing.
And secondly, why
why did she say this stuff?
Off, because the last time this happened
was during Trump's first term, right about
the same time with Steve Bannon, and he
got fired and never got let back in.
[00:01:10]
So I need you to listen to Anna tell you
all the facts, because what she said is
so true of all the different players.
Then we'll come back
and analyze why she did it.
Now, right off the bat, I'll say
that she did defend Trump in various parts
[00:01:29]
of this lengthy interview.
So, for instance, she's very much on board
with striking Venezuelan fishing boats,
is regurgitating the lie
that they're drug traffickers and that
what Trump is doing is totally legal,
which I disagree with personally.
[00:01:45]
But let's get to some
of the statements that were made.
So James Blair, who is Wiles's
36 year old deputy chief of staff, also
spoke to Vanity Fair and said of Wiles
that she doesn't raise her voice,
[00:02:01]
but she likes being around junkyard dogs.
Indeed, Wyles has seemed content
to let her pit bulls
deputy chiefs of staff Miller Blair
and Dan Scavino run loose as she watches.
[00:02:16]
And in fact, she she weighs in on how she
has no interest in controlling Trump.
She views it as unethical to do so.
She doesn't say unethical or use that word
in particular, but her argument is, well,
the American people voted him in,
and so who am I to rein him in when he's,
you know, carrying out the policies
[00:02:37]
that he believes he ran on?
Now, of course, he's reneged on much of
his campaign promises, but nonetheless,
here's what she had to say about Trump.
She doesn't say
that Trump is an alcoholic.
So I want to be clear about that,
because Trump was asked to weigh in
on her statement here,
and he's like, I'm not an alcoholic.
[00:02:55]
That's not what she's saying.
But here's what she did say.
Some clinical psychologists
that knows 1 million times more than I do
will dispute what I'm going to say.
But high functioning alcoholics
or alcoholics in general?
Their personalities
are exaggerated when they drink.
[00:03:12]
And so I'm a little bit of an expert
in big personalities.
Trump has an alcoholics personality.
He operates with a view
that there's nothing he can't do.
Nothing. Zero.
Nothing.
And he certainly carries himself that way.
[00:03:28]
And she does have experience
with alcoholics.
The piece goes into her past
and how her father was an alcoholic.
But just giving you some context there.
And while his relationship with Trump
almost ended at the Miami Golf Club
[00:03:44]
one night in the fall of 2016,
she weighs in on that.
And I thought this story,
this anecdote was really interesting.
So apparently he was incredibly salty
about how he was performing
in the polls in Florida specifically.
And so he decided to berate her
in front of everyone.
[00:04:00]
And so she says of that experience.
It was a horrific hour plus at midnight,
and I don't think I've seen him
that angry since.
He was ranting and raving.
I didn't know whether to argue back
or whether to be stoic.
[00:04:16]
What I really wanted to do was cry.
I finally said, you know, Mr. Trump,
if you want somebody to set their hair
on fire and be crazy, I'm not your girl.
But if you want to win this state, I am.
It's your choice.
And then she walked out.
[00:04:32]
She walked out
and Trump allegedly turned on a dime.
Lo and behold, he called me every day.
Wiles never looked back.
Trump carried Florida.
So I thought that was really interesting.
I think Trump, like many people,
tends to react favorably
[00:04:49]
to the individual he just berated.
If they're willing to walk away
and say, you know what?
Forget it.
He doesn't like people walking out on him.
So I think that's what happened there.
But what are your thoughts, Jake?
Yeah. So that's a power play.
And Trump is a guy.
If you, bow down to him,
he doesn't respect you.
[00:05:09]
He's total lizard brain, right?
And so if you stand up to him, but without
insulting him, then he respects you.
And that's what Susie did.
And that's how she got power.
And I respect Siouxsie Wiles.
I think she's a smart strategist,
but I am perplexed as to why
[00:05:24]
she would tell all this to a reporter
in terms of the alcoholic personality.
Hundred percent.
It doesn't mean he's an alcoholic.
He doesn't drink at all.
But does he think he
could do anything he wants?
Of course.
I mean, look at what he's done
his whole life.
And so if you can't see that,
you're really kind of blinded
[00:05:40]
by your partizan bias.
If you can't see that Trump
has no boundaries at all.
It's kind of like the Democrats
who couldn't see that Joe Biden was old.
That's that's exactly right.
That's absolutely right.
[00:05:56]
In fact, let's talk a little bit
about where Wiles clearly
has disagreements with Trump.
And to be sure, she does have
disagreements, particularly when it comes
to his tariffs policy, which was announced
on so-called Liberation Day.
So she said of that whole situation,
so much thinking out loud
[00:06:14]
is what I would call it, meaning the press
conference for Liberation Day,
where Trump is announcing the tariffs.
There was a huge disagreement
over whether tariffs were a good idea.
And apparently she recruited
Vice President JD Vance
[00:06:30]
to try to like real or rein Trump in
when it came to these these tariffs.
She wanted him to tap the brakes.
So there are some instances in which Wiles
is willing to try to rein in Trump.
But we told Donald Trump,
hey, let's not talk about tariffs today.
[00:06:46]
Let's wait until we have the team
in complete unity and then we'll do it.
But clearly that didn't work.
And Trump moved forward
with the Liberation Day tariffs,
the so-called reciprocal tariffs
from anywhere from anywhere 10% to 100%,
[00:07:04]
which triggered panic in the bond market
and sell off of stocks.
Wiles believed a middle ground on tariffs
would ultimately succeed, she said, but
it's been more painful than I expected.
Don't forget noble mobile
saving you a ton of money.
So a lot of people are signing up now and
beginning to realize what the hell, why am
[00:07:23]
I paying so much to Verizon and AT&T?
So your bills only $50 a month, but it
can actually be less because they give
you money back if you don't use your data.
So if you're paying more than $50,
there's no reason to not switch.
It's crazy not to switch because
same phone, same number, same contacts.
[00:07:38]
Literally nothing changes. Titcomb.
Titcomb. All right, we'll be right back.
So we're about to move on
and talk a little bit about how she feels
about the Trump administration's handling
of the Epstein files and Israel.
[00:07:54]
But before we do, any thoughts on what she
had to say about the tariffs policy?
- Jake?
- Yeah.
So she's basically proving us right
on every single thing we told you.
Like the terror policy,
not supported by any rational person
because he's made it so extreme.
[00:08:10]
We told you, like, if he did moderate
tariffs like he did in the first term,
and he did them reciprocal
and not these extreme tariffs, they would
actually have some chance of working.
But if you go ballistic like this
then it'll really rock the markets
and it'll have no chance of working.
[00:08:25]
Turns out his own chief of staff
agreed with us 100%.
And they all tried to rein him in.
And they can't rein him in
because he's a loose cannon.
He's out of control.
And does he understand
the economic impact of tariffs?
No, no, no,
he barely understands economics at all.
[00:08:42]
Like if you're a Trump supporter
you're in la la land on that.
And you think, oh no way he went to war.
I mean, he's a spoiled little brat.
He hides his grades because he had no
chance of getting into a good school.
He never studied there.
His grades were, I'm sure, abysmal.
That's why he's hiding him.
He doesn't know anything.
[00:08:57]
He doesn't know
the the the basics of economics.
And that's.
And but what's interesting, guys,
is you're seeing here in an honest
behind the scenes conversation,
his entire staff agrees with us.
And the same thing happened
in the first term because they all think
[00:09:15]
that, oh no, he's probably an act.
And he, you know, we get in there
and he's going to be strategic and stuff.
No, no, it's not an act.
I mean, I'll give Trump
that he's not acting.
- He really is that crazy and clueless.
- That's that's exactly right.
So let's talk a little bit about her view
on the Trump administration's handling of
[00:09:33]
the Epstein files and the ongoing genocide
in Gaza carried out by Israel, of course.
So she does see the failure to release
the Epstein files as a huge debacle and a
threat, a political threat to President
Donald Trump, which I totally agree with.
[00:09:52]
I mean, when you have members of your
cabinet who spent years talking about
how the Epstein files need to be released
when you have Trump on the record,
saying that he would release
the Epstein files, and then reneging
as soon as he's elected
and engaging in an obvious cover up.
[00:10:08]
Yeah, that's going to be
a political liability.
Okay, so it doesn't take a genius to
realize that she does do the thing that a
lot of Republican strategists love to do,
which is place all the blame on Pam Bondi.
And to be fair, Pam Bondi
does deserve some of the blame
[00:10:25]
because of the fact that she engaged
in that ridiculous stunt with the binders.
So she again trashed
Pam Bondi binder binder stunt.
Now, when it comes to Israel specifically,
some in the administration
absolutely know that Trump is making
all sorts of unpopular decisions.
[00:10:42]
So a senior white House source told
Vanity Fair that many see Trump as well.
They didn't use this word.
This is my word because I think
it's an accurate way to describe it.
But many see Trump as a cook to Benjamin
Netanyahu because he absolutely is.
[00:10:57]
So here's what the senior
white House official said.
If you dive deeply into the internet,
you'll find things that say,
well, why don't we just put Bebe
at the Resolute Desk,
essentially saying, well, a foreign leader
is the one who's calling the shots,
[00:11:13]
so why don't we just have him
in the Oval Office?
And to be fair, Trump has had an Oval
Office 5 or 6 times since the beginning
of his second term, which is insane.
Okay, in early October,
Trump traveled to Israel to announce
that his envoys had brokered a peace deal.
[00:11:30]
We know that's not true, but he calls
it a peace deal between Israel and Hamas.
Now, during this triumphant appearance
at Israel's Knesset,
Trump praised Netanyahu and the Israeli
armed forces with no mention
[00:11:45]
of the Palestinian civilian casualties.
And here's what Christopher Whipple
reported about it.
Trump had previously lauded Bibi's efforts
in another action by calling
him a war hero, a remark partially aimed
at Israelis talking about it.
[00:12:02]
Then whiles winced.
I'm not sure he fully realizes,
she said, that there's an audience here
that doesn't love it.
And I love to hear that.
What do you think, Jake?
I get blown away by the fact
that she's saying exactly
[00:12:20]
what we've been saying on air.
And so.
And I feel good that I,
from day one, I was like, Siouxsie
Wiles is very strategic, remember?
I don't agree with her policies,
of course.
Right.
But we told you that during the campaign.
I said, watch out.
She's smart, right? And she's formidable.
[00:12:36]
And, the the walkout move
that she did to Trump shows me exactly
how smart and strategic she is.
So again, none of that explains
her telling this to a reporter,
which I'm again stunned by.
I do have one theory on it
we'll get back to in a second.
But in terms of Trump looking like a kook,
[00:12:55]
it's really important
that she gets that information to Trump
because he won't like it.
And the problem is,
Trump is the exact kind of idiot
who would shoot the messenger, right?
So you never shoot the messenger.
Otherwise you'll never get a message.
You'll never know what's happening on
the ground, what's happening in the field.
[00:13:11]
It's a terrible idea.
But Trump will probably get mad
at the person who tells him.
But yeah, his, you know, half his base
thinks it's he's kind of getting walked
around on a dog leash by Netanyahu.
And it's humiliating. Yes.
- And it's humiliating for us.
- It's humiliating for.
[00:13:28]
Look, yeah, of course it's humiliating
for Trump, but who cares?
He's the one who's made the decision
to engage in the cuckoldry.
Right?
But not us. Not the American people.
We want to be led by the American leader.
And that's not what's happening here.
It's embarrassing
to watch the US president
[00:13:44]
get dog walked by a foreign leader.
It doesn't matter
who the foreign leader is, by the way.
It's just that Israel is treated as,
I don't know,
above everything else that exists in life.
- And it's insane.
- Yeah.
You know, I give them a little bit of
credit because, I don't think the people
[00:14:02]
in the Biden White House
knew how much Biden was hated
because of how he was a dog to Israel.
Like, I don't think they
ever got Biden that message.
And Biden might have gotten even angrier
than Trump at that message.
And I think that the Democrats
in the white House were maybe the most
[00:14:17]
clueless people in the country.
But here's Siouxsie Wiles,
chief of staff to Trump, and she gets it.
She's like, yeah, this is humiliating.
And Anna,
I've now seen all over the internet
people saying, I'm not MAGA anymore.
I'm America first.
And they're making that distinction
because they're saying Trump is MAGA
[00:14:36]
and Trump is not America first anymore.
He's Israel first.
And so they're abandoning MAGA
because of that.
I mean, again, she's right.
Strategically, that could be
a huge problem for them politically.
But once you get into Washington, you
get this, Israel mind virus, a must serve
[00:14:55]
Israel must serve Israel at all costs,
even if it ruins your reputation,
it ruins your career,
and it costs you the election.
It cost the Democrats the election.
And they walked off the plank
for Israel anyway.
Yeah, you're absolutely right about that.
Will end on her statements about J.D.
[00:15:10]
Vance, which I also found
incredibly fascinating.
So when it comes to J.D.
Vance, she says that his conversion
from a Never Trumper
to a Maga acolyte has been political.
Or, she says, sort of political.
So the vice president, the vice president,
she added, has been a conspiracy theorist
[00:15:30]
for a decade, which is what Vance
was responding to in that clip that we
showed you at the start of this story.
So Vance had a different take,
telling Vanity Fair that I realized
that I actually liked him.
Meaning he realized, oh, no.
It turns out I actually do like Trump.
[00:15:47]
I thought he was doing
a lot of good things,
and I thought that he was fundamentally
the right person to save the country.
Now, switching to being a Trump acolyte
has worked out really well for J.D.
Vance.
And already, you know,
it seems as though J.D.
[00:16:04]
Vance is the heir apparent
in the next presidential race
in terms of being the candidate.
We'll see how that plays out.
There's still an eternity
from now until Election Day 2028,
but I side with Siouxsie Wiles on this.
I do actually think that his reasons
for supporting Trump were completely
[00:16:23]
political, but aside from that,
she made the argument that Marco Rubio
came around genuinely, that you can't
convince him to do something that goes
against his values or his principles.
I know I disagree with her on that.
[00:16:42]
All right.
We found something we disagree on.
Okay.
So, look, I, JD Vance
looks like he was created in a lab
by Adam Thiel and Elon Musk.
And so I don't know what he believes, and
I don't think he knows what he believes.
Until Thiel and Musk tell him.
[00:16:57]
So, are they going to side with Israel?
Very, very, very likely.
But is he going to pull the same move
that he does to them?
I mean, he was born to cook.
He will because he was created by donors.
So he's of the donors,
by the donors, for the donors.
So he again for the next election.
[00:17:15]
We don't know what his opinions
are going to be
until they're told to him at that time.
So for Siouxsie Wiles, though,
Anna, finally, to get back to this,
why do they do this?
And this one?
I guess the theory is they talk
to reporters, Siouxsie Wiles and people
[00:17:31]
like her because they want to shape
the narrative in their favor.
But how?
She's such a veteran and so savvy.
Otherwise, how did she fall into the trap
of saying obviously true things
[00:17:46]
to a reporter on the record?
I don't know why she did that.
And actually, you know what's interesting?
Many of the interviews, because there were
11 interviews total, right, to basically
get statements for her for this piece.
[00:18:02]
And Whipple notes
that many of the interviews
took place on Sundays after church.
And so I'm wondering if those sermons,
you know, persuaded her
to just be super honest, I don't know.
I'm just putting a guess out there.
But she doesn't like the piece.
I want to be clear about that.
[00:18:20]
It does come in two parts, and we'll
include the link in the description box
so you guys can check it out.
But she says that,
significant context was disregarded.
And much of what I and others said
about the team and the president
was left out of the story.
[00:18:35]
I assume after reading it that this was
done to paint an overwhelmingly chaotic
and negative narrative
about the president and our team.
Actually, I disagree with that.
I did not get the sense that there's chaos
in the Trump administration.
[00:18:51]
It felt way more chaotic
in his first term.
Now, I think he's significantly worse
in his second term as opposed to his
first term, especially since he's dragging
the United States into wars that we
shouldn't be involved in at all, period.
But nonetheless, the take that I got
was she seems to be pretty honest.
[00:19:10]
And she even went after Elon Musk
and the ending of USAID programs.
She thought it was disastrous.
So maybe she doesn't like the fact
that she was too honest.
But I appreciate it.
And I didn't get the sense
that things are chaotic.
I got the sense that unfortunately,
right now, the Trump administration
[00:19:28]
is a well-oiled machine
that's carrying out incredibly damaging
policies for the American people.
Yeah. And so.
Yeah, I don't think
that it's chaotic at all.
I think, Susan, and it sounds weird
that I keep agreeing with Siouxsie Wiles.
[00:19:45]
Again, not on the policy, guys.
I respect her
like I respect the Dick Cheney.
I think his agenda was terrible and evil.
But he knew how to move
the bureaucracy around.
And I get the same sense
from Siouxsie Wiles.
[00:20:00]
And your theory that, Whipple was
the reporter here was really smart and
basically got confessionals from her from,
after she came out of church
is an interesting one, but, But I don't
know that that's why she did it.
Look, I think that she'll probably
survive this, they'll just say fake news
[00:20:19]
a bunch of times.
And and there is one one more thing
that she's probably right about.
But again,
it doesn't really excuse it because.
Did do reporters talk to you for hours
and hours and hours and then take only the
quotes that help their cause from that?
[00:20:35]
Yes.
It's happened to me many times.
It happens all the time.
So did she praise
the Trump administration?
In a lot of ways
that was left out of the story.
I'm sure she did. I'm sure it was right.
But again, if I know it,
Siouxsie Wiles should know it.
[00:20:51]
She should be savvy enough
to know that the guy's going to take
the most damaging things you say.
And and that's logical.
As a reporter, those are the more
interesting, fascinating, spectacular
things that come out of this piece.
So she should have known better.
Every time you ring the bell below,
an angel gets his wings.
[00:21:08]
Totally not true, but it does
keep you updated on our live shows.
Now Playing (Clips)
Episode
Podcast
