Nov 12, 2025
Cenk CRASHES OUT Over Graham Platner Polling
Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner is positioned to lose against Sen. Susan Collins, according to a recent poll.
- 21 minutes
Things are not looking good for the Gram
Plattner campaign, and new polling shows
that he may be in for a major defeat
if he squares off against Susan Collins
in the general election.
And we've got more.
But what are your $0.02 here?
[00:00:17]
Yeah, I don't believe the poll.
So you're going to read the poll,
and then I'm going to question
the people who did the poll.
I think they're bad guys
even though they're on our side.
Theoretically.
And then I want to have
a real discussion with you on.
Forget staying in the race.
[00:00:32]
Who who do you think
you support in the race?
And I support in the race and have
a real discussion about it, because I
think that this stinks to high heaven.
But tell us the facts,
and then we'll discuss it.
Okay.
Democratic group Emily's list has released
new data gauging Maine voters thoughts
[00:00:52]
on Plattner in a head to head race against
Republican Senator Susan Collins,
before testing a matchup
between Plattner and Collins,
the poll summarizes pro platinum
messaging, including his military service
and his promise to fight the billionaire
class, and makes politics
[00:01:09]
and make politics work for regular people.
Along with likely Republican attacks
about the Communist label and his comments
about police, with that information,
Collins leads Plattner 51% to 42%.
That gap grew to 19 points
after voters were provided with more
[00:01:29]
quotes from Plattner Reddit posts,
and when voters were provided
with a lengthy apology response.
He only narrowed the gap by five points.
Now, Emily's list has a goal
of electing Democratic women,
and they have endorsed Plattner
opponent Janet Mills in the primary.
[00:01:48]
The most recent major poll
on that primary, which was conducted
before it was revealed that 20 years ago,
Plattner got a tattoo resembling
a symbol used by the Nazis,
showed Plattner was up by 34 points.
Another poll from a lesser known pollster,
SoCal strategies,
[00:02:06]
conducted during the week Platina's tattoo
and Reddit history were made public
and in the news showed Mills ahead by five
points when Platina's tattoo was mentioned
to respondents in that poll.
Miller's lead grew to 30 points.
[00:02:22]
To make matters worse for Platina's
campaign, over the last few weeks, several
top staff members from his campaign have
left, including his campaign manager,
political director and finance director.
Now that primary is June 9th, 2026.
[00:02:39]
So Jank, I guess the question is,
of course you have reservations
about that Emily's list poll,
but there is a lot of time here.
Do you think he should stay in the race?
Yeah, definitely.
I, I all of his opponents
are what make me support him more.
[00:02:56]
So I'm going to come back to Emily's list,
which I have massive doubts
and skepticism about.
But first, look,
I want to give you guys context.
If I thought there was a guy in the race
who was going to hurt our chances of
winning, especially against Susan Collins.
[00:03:11]
When we absolutely need to win the Senate,
we need to win Congress back.
And the guy is talking about how.
Oh, yeah, the right wing white voters
in Maine are stupid or racist.
I mean, you've heard the show
for the last, year, two years, etc.
[00:03:27]
We've been telling you, don't do that.
Don't do that.
That's a really bad idea.
Don't attack the voters.
Instead, you know,
go after the politicians
and make that distinction clear.
ET cetera.
So if we thought he was a bad guy or.
[00:03:42]
I mean, let me speak for myself, not we.
If I thought he was a bad guy,
then I would tell you.
Oh, yeah, that's terrible.
And that would hurt him in the election,
etcetera, etcetera.
But I don't get the sense
that he's a bad guy.
I get the sense that he was frustrated.
He said that stuff.
[00:03:59]
And and at this point
that doesn't back that at all.
Now there's two different things.
Whether he meant it and is problematic to
begin with on all the different charges.
Then the second thing is, even if he
didn't mean it or he meant it at the time,
[00:04:14]
but that's because he was, you know, going
through PTSD or whatever that you've got.
People grow, people mature, people evolve.
Right.
But now it has the right position.
But still, you're worried that it
might hurt his chances of winning
and our chances of winning.
Okay.
So these are all legitimate questions.
[00:04:29]
Right.
And but at the same time,
like, if I thought.
Yeah.
So from my perspective on those questions,
I don't think it's necessarily going to.
I get that he's going to do damage. Right.
But I'm not convinced that he
that Mills is a better candidate.
[00:04:48]
And I'm certainly not convinced
that he meant that stuff
and still means it secretly today.
If I thought that,
I would have no interest in him at all.
Okay. And the attack against the cops.
We were all frustrated about cops back
in the day when he was frustrated
about Backups at this point.
[00:05:05]
You know, our stance, which is easy,
which is we're against crime.
That's not hard.
And so if I thought this guy's
soft on that again,
it wouldn't be my inclination to back him.
Right.
But he's been running a very populist
campaign calling out the establishment,
[00:05:21]
calling out the donors, calling
out everybody he needs to call out.
Right.
And all of a sudden, this giant vat
of oppo research is dumped in his lap
and they're like, ha ha, we got you.
You're smeared. You're canceled.
That's it.
And Jordan, where my skepticism comes
in on this poll is all of a sudden Emily's
[00:05:39]
list, which I think is one
of the worst organizations in in politics,
comes in and goes, oh, we did a poll.
It shows he would be much worse than our
candidate, who is totally backed by all
corporate donors and the establishment.
Oh, you have to trust us.
We have our your best intentions in mind.
[00:05:57]
Here we are again, putting a giant hatchet
in the back of a progressive or populist
or outsider or anyone wanting change.
And that is the main role of Emily's list.
I think the rest of it is a cover story,
a total operation.
I don't know what they've done
to help women's rights.
I've never heard them in any fight
where they mattered at all, but where I
[00:06:16]
have heard them a thousand times.
Jordan is back when we were starting
Justice Democrats,
and throughout all this entire time
before the crypto guys and before AIPAC,
if a progressive was running Emily's list
was going to support the establishment
candidate opposed to them in the primary,
and then do everything they could
[00:06:35]
to defeat progressives.
So I'm not really that interested
in a poll from Emily's list,
which I think has an excellent chance
of being just utterly fake, period.
That's my view.
Okay, now I'm pretty harsh on it,
obviously.
What do you think?
[00:06:51]
Yeah, I mean, some of what you said
I agree with.
I think Emily's list has used
gender politics in this country
over the past couple decades as a wedge.
They've used it as a cudgel.
[00:07:06]
I mean, they really tried to weaponize it
when Bernie was running
to support the establishment.
Totally with you.
They're now putting even just putting
that whole poll aside, you know,
if you want to put weight in that SoCal
strategies poll that also found that
[00:07:25]
Plattner was behind, that's concerning.
And I think we need to put ourselves
in the minds of the average person, right.
We think deeply about these issues.
Most voters do.
Not many vote maybe, maybe, maybe many.
We'll go with that.
[00:07:40]
But when they hear that their one
of their potential candidates
has a tattoo that resembles a Nazi symbol
that has and they will strip,
you know, Jank, you ran for office,
they will strip the context of his Reddit
posts to make him seem seem even worse.
[00:07:56]
And in the framing and attack ads
and the media, they will continue
to hammer these points that he said things
that he now regrets online Years ago.
They're not going to be nuanced
or understanding or forgiving, or provide
context for what he was in mentally,
physically, professionally at those times.
[00:08:18]
I think he's he's apologized for him.
I think everyone should have a little bit
of grace for that kind of stuff,
but that's not how they're going
to portray it in the media.
And if he's going to be subject
to these attacks for months,
again, this primary is in June.
What concerns me, not his policies,
it's that voters will be subject
[00:08:35]
to these distractions.
And at the end of the day, he might either
lose the primary or lose against Collins.
That's a fickle state.
We know this Maine is a is a weird
a weird state to run in.
It's, you know, somewhat reliably
Democratic in presidential elections.
[00:08:52]
But somehow Susan Collins
has held on to that job.
So my my thought is, hey, you've
got a ton of time to stand up a campaign,
find somebody without that baggage
who will run on those same things
and start building that up now,
[00:09:08]
rather than just crossing our fingers
and hope it's it's Plattner
and then hope he withstands that,
that barrage of attack ads in the general.
Yeah. So, I hear you on all that.
Those are all reasonable points.
But here's my pushback on all of that.
[00:09:25]
Okay.
So first, again, real quick, because I
don't want to get distracted by Emily's
list, but we lost Roe v Wade while Emily's
list was fighting for women's rights.
Where were you?
Oh, no.
We sent out a bunch of fundraising emails.
[00:09:41]
I'm sure you did. I'm sure you did.
But you didn't win that fight.
You didn't win any of the fights.
But whenever there's an issue
of identity politics,
Emily's list is at the front of the line.
No, you have to vote for Hillary.
No, it doesn't matter that she's backed
by Oracle corporations.
Shut up and vote for the woman. Right.
[00:09:56]
And there's other organizations,
and their job is to say,
shut up and vote for fill in the blank X,
Y, z different groups, okay.
And their job and they are funded by
the establishment to destroy progressives,
so they use identity politics
in the most grotesque way
[00:10:11]
to target anyone outside the system.
So here comes a brother who is so firmly
and aggressively outside the system
and fighting for the average guy.
And all of a sudden, here comes
all the worst people in Washington,
attacking him in such a voracious way that
it makes me want to go, all right, I'm
[00:10:27]
going to quadruple down on Graham Platner.
Okay.
And now you say, okay.
Well, Jake, don't do that out of spite.
We need to win the race.
Of course, of course.
So, Jordan, let me make the case for why I
think, that he's the better candidate.
Okay, number one, you've got, the what I'm
[00:10:45]
going to call the Mamdani phenomenon.
So Mamdani was attacked
just as viciously as Platner is.
Now, they didn't have
as much material on him.
All they had on him was,
he's Muslim and he's a communist.
[00:11:01]
But, I mean, he's an Mamdani
is an actual socialist, whereas Platner
is neither a communist nor a Nazi.
Right.
So there's actually
no substance behind it.
Oh, so they're going
to attack him that way.
So what, they attack Mamdani that way.
So in reality,
that actually helped Mamdani.
[00:11:18]
Why did it help Mamdani?
Even though mainstream media
hit him with a nuke,
they threw every dirty trick on him.
They went and searched for every.
Oh, he was in a rap song.
This he was that he once didn't help a,
you know, a grandmother across the street.
[00:11:33]
He wasn't even aware of.
I got they they nuked him and he survived.
And he won.
It made him stronger. Why?
Because they accidentally
put a spotlight on the race.
And once you put a spotlight on the race
and people start paying attention,
our policies and our style again,
left wing populists is so much more
[00:11:54]
popular than anything else in the country.
So the minute there's a spotlight
on the race, people go, oh, really?
You guys are fighting
against the establishment?
Oh, you guys hate the corruption.
You guys hate the wars.
You guys are trying to fight for higher
wages, lower drug prices, etc..
Wait, I came to hate you all of a sudden.
I love you, right?
[00:12:11]
And so that spotlight helped.
Mamdani didn't hurt him.
And if they nuked him twice,
it would have helped him twice as much.
So I'm not sure that this is going
to hurt him at all.
Number two,
there's cancel culture, blowback.
Okay.
So especially with independent voters,
but maybe even some right wing voters,
[00:12:29]
when you go to them and you go,
okay, Susan Collins is a beautiful member
of the establishment.
She loves all of her corporate donors,
loves money in politics, and loves Israel.
And so you should all bow your head
to Susan Collins, all of you independents
and right wing voters.
And the other guy is
he should be canceled.
[00:12:48]
He's it looks like he's fighting for you
guys, but the establishment hates him.
And he was a Nazi on the right,
and he was a communist on the left.
And he hates cops,
and he hates people who hate cops.
And he hates everyone.
And you should hate him.
I think a lot of people are going to go.
Really?
[00:13:04]
Tell me more about this guy.
Because now I'm kind of interested
because once the bad guys
and the evil forces come against someone
and you bring the spotlight,
people start to look into it and go,
oh, maybe that guy
is actually looking out for us, and that's
why everybody's throwing dirt on him.
[00:13:21]
And so in the last part of it, Jordan,
is I don't think Mills is going to win.
Maine is a graveyard
for corporate Democrats.
How many corporate Democrats
have we run against?
Susan Collins?
And every time morons like Chuck Schumer
and literally everyone in mainstream media
[00:13:39]
who are all biased, corrupt
and dumb as a brick come in and go,
oh, support the corporate candidate.
They'll beat Susan Collins.
We're going to win Republicans
in the suburbs.
We've outraised them.
We have all this corporate cash,
and people in Maine love it.
And we're going to beat Susan Collins.
[00:13:55]
And I've seen that movie 200 times
and they've never beaten her.
So if Chuck Schumer
and I'm not just putting it on him,
but the entire establishment comes
and tells me to back Mills.
Well, then I think, well,
that's a near guaranteed loss.
[00:14:10]
So why don't I try something else?
Now to your point.
Okay, let's just find a rando in Maine now
and restart an entire campaign and have
that person be left wing politics.
But what difference does it make, Jordan?
Then they're going to find dirt on him.
They're gonna be like,
oh, did you know in 1987, he brought
[00:14:26]
bought groceries from the checkout clerk
that was white and not Asian.
So he's a racist against Asians
or whatever nonsense
they're going to make up about that guy.
There isn't a single populist
that they won't dig up dirt on.
So what's the difference?
[00:14:42]
Well, I think it's the severity
of what they dig up.
And to go to your mom, Donny,
point the attacks that they levied
against him, we all just laughed them off
because they were ridiculous.
Oh, he tried to launch a rap career.
Like, who cares?
[00:14:59]
You know, like, obviously the baseless,
anti-Semitic stuff that we saw
from the pro-Israel lobby didn't resonate
because people could just see that.
He never said that.
That's why all of the framing was why
won't you denounce this specific phrase?
[00:15:15]
Well, he's never said it.
Why are you asking him?
People saw through that here.
It's. It's him.
It's him doing.
It's him saying these things.
It's him with the tattoo. That's tough.
And there's also a concern
that this might just be the start.
[00:15:31]
Like this again, this primary is in June.
I don't think campaigns typically
dump all of their oppo right away.
So I think it is a concern from some
people that it may continue to mount
and snowball and more will come.
Look, Jake, there's the population
of Maine is 1.4 million.
[00:15:48]
It had over 800,000 people vote
in the presidential election in 2024.
I don't think it's necessarily
plucking a rando.
There's indivisible groups,
there's grassroots community groups.
Our revolution still exists
in some pockets of the country.
You know, maybe there's a there's
a progressive elected official in a in
[00:16:05]
a city or in the state legislature.
It's not that hard to find somebody
who could run, who knows it doesn't
have like, again, a tattoo or had a tattoo
that resembles a Nazi symbol
or has said the things that he said.
[00:16:21]
I'm not saying that people can't change
or that he makes mistakes.
I do think on the tattoo thing,
it was an instance of a dumb troop
who just picked out a symbol
because he thought it looked cool, like
I'm willing to to have some grace there.
But I think in the average mind
of a voter,
they're going to be off put by that.
[00:16:38]
And the initial polling between Platner
and Collins in a general, if that,
if we are to believe that was 6
or 7 points, which is about the difference
in the presidential election in 2024.
So look, if you and one other thing
that he said he was criticizing
[00:16:58]
were rural people in Maine as stupid,
that is going to come.
I think that might even be
the most damaging thing of everything,
because then you're insulting the voters.
That's hard to overcome.
So look, I don't really have
a strong affinity for this guy.
[00:17:14]
Like, I think his platform is good.
And we should see more platforms like that
in politics across the country.
But I'm sure there's at least
one other person in Maine who doesn't have
that baggage and also shares those ideals.
There's likely many because we
know those views are popular.
[00:17:30]
So all I'm saying is because we
have like seven months until this primary,
that's a lot of time.
Look, people were saying a new campaign
should be stood up in three months
instead of Kamala Harris.
If people were willing
to make the argument looking at you
[00:17:47]
that within three months you can stand
up a presidential campaign, you can have
seven months to stand up a Senate race.
Yeah, it's super theoretical.
I'm not going to.
The guy was kicking ass
until all this cancerous, toxic dirt.
So. And I don't want to reward the dirt,
I hate it.
[00:18:04]
So let's last thing, guys.
Let's break down the two things
that you said there on the tattoo to.
Every time we mention it, I feel like we
get independent voters backing him.
And again, maybe even some right wingers.
Not because they're Nazis, right?
But because the the the it's
so obvious they're trying to cancel it.
[00:18:23]
Like you're saying like everybody's
saying he's way too left wing.
He's calling the right wing
stupid and racist.
So that's why he's a right wing Nazi.
That makes no sense.
It makes no sense at all.
And the more people hear that, the more
they're going to think this is cancel
[00:18:39]
culture BS. How do I spell his name?
How do I get on board with can
I volunteer for this guy?
Okay, so not because of the tattoo,
but because of the cancel culture BS
surrounding the tattoo.
Okay.
Now the second thing is wait wait wait.
Now, I agree with you, Jordan,
that calling the voters stupid,
[00:18:57]
whether the right wing Republican or not,
or rural voters or is terrible.
We've been saying that
for a long time here on TV. Right?
So. But wait a minute.
We're being told by the establishment
that that's a terrible thing,
and it automatically disqualifies you.
[00:19:14]
Hasn't Jasmine Crockett called
white right wing voters stupid and racist?
Approximately 200 times?
Well, the establishment isn't saying
that that was in his Reddit history.
That'll likely emerge in attack ads.
I mean, think.
[00:19:32]
So should we not run Jasmine Crockett?
Because she's done.
Because she's said the same things that we
think is the most damaging for planner?
No, I think it's different
when you're running statewide
and you need those rural votes
versus a metropolitan area in Dallas.
- It's a totally different voter base.
- That's totally fair.
[00:19:50]
Okay. And a good point by Jordan.
But at the same time, the same people
who love Jasmine Crockett are telling me
that those are unacceptable things to say.
Well, apparently they became
unacceptable two days ago
because before that was identity politics
that the establishment loved.
[00:20:06]
I'm not trying to criticize
Jasmine Crockett.
I'm just telling you that's a thing
that a lot of Democrats have said tons
and tons and tons of Democrats have said,
and we were the ones fighting against it.
And now all of a sudden they claim,
oh, insulting the right wing voters
is the worst thing you could do.
[00:20:22]
Really? You guys think that?
Well, I'm glad you've surrendered to us
and that you.
I want apologies from everyone in
the establishment and every left wing show
and everyone out on the planet
saying the Young Turks are right.
You shouldn't insult the voters.
When am I going to get that?
[00:20:38]
Oh, you're not going to get that
because it isn't about that.
It's about making sure that they put
a hatchet in this guy's back and.
Yeah.
No, it's it's for me. Jordan.
Undeniable hatchet job.
And the more you reward hatchet jobs,
the more hatchet jobs you'll get.
[00:20:57]
So I'm thinking of signing up
to help them.
I knew we would have
a good conversation on this topic.
All right, there you go.
Mission accomplished.
Every time you ring the bell below,
an angel gets its wings.
Totally not true.
But it does keep you updated
on our live shows.
Now Playing (Clips)
Episode
Podcast
