Jul 30, 2025
THIS Explains Why We Have A Housing Crisis
One in five homes in California is owned by investors, helping to fuel the ongoing housing crisis.
- 9 minutes
An alarming new report
shows the infiltration of investors
into the California housing market.
And honestly, it shows no signs of slowing
down, especially considering the fact
that we have a governor here
who has no interest
[00:00:15]
in serving the people of California.
He's focusing
on his presidential aspirations,
even though he's destroyed the state.
And our state legislature is more
concerned about passing bills that force
workers in the state to take trainings
on avoiding workplace violence annually.
[00:00:35]
So at least I know that I'm not supposed
to slap any of my coworkers around.
Okay.
But God forbid they pass any legislation
that reins in these investors
who are essentially snatching
up residential real estate
in an era when we have a housing shortage
[00:00:53]
and an ongoing housing crisis.
So, according to batch data,
a data tracker that collects information
from property records,
California's overall percentage of
investor homeownership sits at At 19% 19%,
1 in 5 homes snatched up by an investor.
[00:01:11]
Yeah, and that's actually a tiny bit lower
than the national average,
which is at 20%.
So one of the parts of the populist plank
on our website, populist plank.com,
if you want to go through there
is stop ban private equity
from buying residential homes,
because the more people
are buying homes as an investment, whether
[00:01:28]
it's private equity or others, obviously
it's driving the price up big time.
I mean, you're about to see in California,
the prices are through the roof.
Right.
And this is part of the reason why
because there's a lot more demand
from those houses, because you've got
these institutional investors,
Wall Street, coming in to buy these homes.
So that's why we're having this problem.
[00:01:47]
This story is California centric, but this
is impacting everyone across the country.
So I'll give you an example.
When I was in rural Maine to do Tucker
Carlson's podcast, wonderful woman that I
met, Jen, she drove me from the airport
to, you know, the place I was staying in.
[00:02:05]
And she was talking about how she
and her family saved and saved and saved
in order to put a down payment on a home.
There's no homes available to buy.
And so they're even in rural Maine.
They're running into the same issue.
[00:02:20]
So let's get to the details.
Real quick on that, Anna. Yes.
So, Hawaii and Alaska are the two states
that have, the most amount of homes
bought by investors, rural Alaska.
Isn't that interesting?
And the two other states that are
at the top are Arkansas and West Virginia.
[00:02:38]
Yep.
So this is a they're partly my theory
on that is partly because in places like
West Virginia, there's no one to help you.
So they could just
swoop up all the houses.
- No restrictions, no nothing.
- There's no one to help us here either.
Yeah, I hear you, but no one's
paying attention in those places,
[00:02:54]
and Wall Street's going nuts.
So, as I mentioned earlier, about 19% of
the residential real estate in California
has been purchased by investors.
That comes out to about 1.45
million homes statewide.
Okay.
But the rate is actually higher
in the state's mountain regions such as
[00:03:13]
Sierra County, which has an 83% share
of its homes owned by investors, compared
with coastal Ventura County at just 14%.
In seven California counties
Sierra, Trinity, mono, alpine,
[00:03:30]
Plumas, Modoc and Calaveras,
investors owned more than 50% of homes.
Fantastic.
Now, California's most urban counties
had lower shares of investor owned homes,
with Los Angeles County at 15%
and San Francisco, San Diego
[00:03:49]
and Orange counties at 16%.
That's still very high
when we have a housing shortage.
So while our garbage governor, Gavin
Newsom, has his presidential aspirations
top of mind, he doesn't care about
anything that's going on in his own state
[00:04:06]
because he's a pathetic scumbag.
Scumbag.
There is at least one state assembly
member who's looking to crack down
on the largest corporate investors.
So great.
We've got one. We've got one chink.
So that's Democratic Assembly member
Alex Lee.
He's proposing legislation
to cap the number of single family homes
[00:04:25]
corporations can buy in the state.
He says, quote, I would say
it's housing crisis profiteering.
So as we produce more housing,
we don't want the market
to be eliminated or narrowed
because of those corporate actors.
Alex Lee, thank you.
[00:04:41]
Because my big concern
and I've been talking about this and no
one seems to care, but it's important.
So there's been a lot of talk about
loosening up zoning restrictions and
various codes that we have in the state
in order to spur new housing development,
[00:04:58]
and I actually think that's a good idea.
I do think that there's overregulation
in California as it pertains to being able
to build new homes.
Okay.
But if you don't deal with private equity
or the problem that we're having with
[00:05:14]
investors coming in and scooping up homes,
well, then we're going to continue
running into the same problem.
We want to make sure that that
residential real estate is reserved for,
like, you know, residents of California
who want to buy a place to live
[00:05:29]
for themselves and their families.
So I love the way
that Alex Lee framed that.
Now, Texas based company Invitation Homes,
which is a major institutional investor
in single family homes
all across the country.
They don't like that. Okay.
They don't like this at all.
[00:05:44]
They responded to his proposal by saying,
this is a tired narrative
that lawmakers often promote
that distracts from the real I'm sorry,
that distracts from the real causes
of high housing costs
in markets like California.
[00:06:01]
So I disagree. I think this is a problem.
I think we have multiple problems
when it comes to housing in America,
especially in major cities.
Yes.
Institutional investors,
that's a big problem.
Foreign investors who don't even live here
snatching up and buying residential
[00:06:19]
real estate, that's another problem
that needs to be banned.
Okay.
And then the other issue is the lack
of housing that's being built.
So we do need to spur
more housing development.
And luckily on a federal level,
Congress is working on something.
[00:06:35]
I don't know if it's actually going
to make a difference
or if it's going to pass.
But notably, Invitation Homes didn't say
what the real causes
of the housing crisis happened to be.
And keep in mind, in 2024, the company
paid $2 million in a settlement
[00:06:50]
after the California attorney general
sued Invitation Homes for price gouging.
So Lee's proposal did pass through
the Assembly, and now it's heading
to the Senate Judiciary Committee next.
But in reality, California is
actually below the average
[00:07:07]
when it comes to investor owned homes.
So things are bad in California, but it's
worse in other parts of the country.
The state ranks 36th in the country and
just a shade under 20% national average.
[00:07:22]
And so tourist heavy states
and states with smaller populations
to Jake's Point earlier did have higher
shares of investor owned homes,
and those states include Hawaii at 40%,
Alaska at 35%, Vermont at 31%,
[00:07:39]
West Virginia at 30%, and Wyoming at 30%.
And the trend continues.
Overall, investors purchased more homes
in the first quarter of 2025,
with the total rising to 26.8%
of all residential property sales.
[00:07:55]
Yeah.
You know who was onto this
before anyone else?
John Dutton.
He would not let them buy his land.
Okay.
All right. I'm talking about Yellowstone.
The show.
Okay, seriously, though,
you see that Wyoming stat?
You see all those rural areas
they're snatching up the homes in?
[00:08:13]
Okay.
Number one. Yes.
They want some people want vacation homes.
And yes, there are a variety
of different people who are buying these.
Some only have 1 to 5 homes.
Whatever only means in that context.
Some have 5 to 10 homes.
And then there's the bankers
who have infinite number of homes.
[00:08:29]
And it's because they're buying
for their company, obviously.
But if they succeed, guys,
what winds up happening?
The most important thing is not only does
it sometimes ruin your way of life,
as you know, the show Yellowstone showed,
but more importantly, it's going
to turn us all into renters and then we're
[00:08:46]
not creating any wealth for our families.
Instead, Wall Street
and the already wealthy are creating
that those assets and that wealth.
And then we have we're further attached
to our corporate jobs
because we we got to pay the rent, and the
rent keeps going up and we have no wealth.
[00:09:03]
And we our health care
is attached to the job.
Now our ability to, you know, live in a
have shelter is attached to our job, etc..
So then they're going to have us
by the, you know where.
So we have to stop this
before they get to critical mass
[00:09:18]
and buy so many homes that we all get
turned into indentured servants.
We need some cops on the beat.
It's sad that there's literally
like one Assembly member in the state
of California who's on this issue.
Every time you ring the bell below,
an angel gets his wings.
Totally not true, but it does
keep you updated on our live shows.
Now Playing (Clips)
Episode
Podcast