Marjorie Taylor Green is not happy with Speaker Johnson. So she is one of two Republicans who voted no on Johnson's Israel aid package. And she doesn't fault him for putting that aid on the floor. But she expressed frustration with Johnson for failing to pass her resolution, censoring Representative Rashida Tlaib for her criticism and protests of Israel. [00:00:19] This sounds like it's a personal problem, same as she's gonna mention happened to Gates, more details. So in this interview with the Daily Caller, Marjorie Taylor Green began with her irritation that the Republican rejection of her first attempt at censure of Talib. She said, we had 20, [00:00:34] few Republicans that voted with Democrats to table my resolution because they claimed they were protecting what she did to leave freedom of speech. Which is jaw dropping to me because I wasn't silencing her freedom of speech. [LAUGH] I wanted her censored for her speech [LAUGH] [00:00:49] >> [LAUGH] >> Okay, bro, a little bit more, Green went on to lay the blame at the feet of Johnson. Now, this is where he gets involved for not whipping enough votes in support of her resolution. And she appeared to tease another speakership battle here. She says, well, he didn't help whip any votes for it. [00:01:06] He told people to vote their conscience, must be a horrible thing to say. So he was not supportive of it. And, you know, in our conference, we had Matt Gates and seven other Republicans that declared red lines where any speaker that passes a CR or funds Ukraine war funding should be ousted. [00:01:23] She says, she continues from that point, so my question is, we're about to have Speaker Johnson pass the CR, and he's talking about passing mega, mega Ukraine funding, trying to pair it with the border security, pretending that the Biden administration is gonna do anything to secure our borders. And he's already funded another foreign war, which is Israel. [00:01:41] Where are the red lines, do they still apply? Or are the eight willing to admit that it was really something personal the entire time? Damn battle lines have been drawn. And by the way, Trey, yo, she's kind of right. Sorry to say it that way, but she's kind of right, [00:01:57] as crazy it is the things that they want and the reasons they got rid of McCarthy. Mike Johnson's gonna have to do some of those same things which we've already mentioned, but. >> Right. >> You can then point out what's the difference then? Sounds like you just didn't like Kevin McCarthy, which, by the way, you can. A lot of people. >> Right. [00:02:12] >> Don't like Kevin McCarthy [LAUGH] >> Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I don't know, I wouldn't look to them for consistency or anything like that anyway. It's not gonna make them seem like less crazy to me if they end up being hypocritical on this one particular thing, you just add it onto the pile with them. But it'll be something, though I think, it's like I said, the party at [00:02:32] large is being held hostage by this tiny minority of its craziest members. And they've made that bed now they got to lay in it. And I just don't think it's gonna get any more comfortable for them anytime soon because it's just not in these people's nature. So if it's not this, it'll be something else before too long. [00:02:48] I mean, maybe I'm wrong, but I'm pretty confident in that so. And again, it was Matt Gates, it was one guy who was able to bring up this. >> Right. >> Vote to oust McCarthy, and they're thinking about potentially changing that because that madness did make them look very good. They're trying to see the number, they're still debating whether I go to seven or [00:03:04] eight or up to 100 people that would have to be on board. Something to make it a little bit more secure and stable there, which it's instable. So how are they going to figure that out? [MUSIC]