Senate candidate Abby Broyles (D-OK) blasted incumbent Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) in response to TYT's report about the EPA stripping tribes of sovereignty.

 

(Image: Screengrab of Broyles campaign website.)

Inhofe's Rival and Others Blast Him and EPA After TYT Report

Abby Broyles, the Democratic candidate running against Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), responded to the news that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had stripped away regulatory control from Oklahoma tribes by attacking him.

After TYT reported the EPA's actions on Monday, Broyles released a press release saying, “Jim Inhofe has been actively working against our tribes since 2005. It’s no coincidence his longtime staffer seized the opportunity to attack tribal sovereignty and ignore the Supreme Court ruling.”

EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler, who on Oct. 1 authorized the takeover, worked for Inhofe for 14 years. Broyles' mention of 2005 refers to a two-paragraph rider attached to an 836-page transportation bill in 2005 that took away tribal control of environmental issues if requested by the state of Oklahoma.

With Wheeler's aid, Inhofe got the rider through. As part of a federal bill, it nullifies even the Supreme Court's McGirt v. Oklahoma decision that much of eastern Oklahoma is still tribal land because of previous treaties.

In her statement, Broyles added, “Our tribal nations’ sovereignty should be honored, and they should be allowed to work directly with the EPA instead of having extra hurdles placed in their way. It’s no surprise Jim would want to put this in front of state leaders, especially in the midst of their openly hostile relationship with the tribes right now…”

Rep. Nannette Barragan (D-CA), a leading pro-environment voice in Congress, responded to TYT's request for comment with a Tweet criticizing Wheeler for what she called his "attack on sovereignty."

TYT contacted the offices of Inhofe and Gov. Kevin Stitt (R-OK), as well as the Trump and Biden campaigns, for comment on our story, but none responded.

Stitt was quoted Monday by The Hill, stating, “This approval helps to better protect public health and our environment by ensuring certainty and one consistent set of regulations for all citizens of Oklahoma, including those who are also citizens of one of Oklahoma’s federally recognized Tribes…”

Cherokee Nation Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. reportedly disagrees. The Hill quotes him saying, “Unfortunately, the governor’s decision to invoke a 2005 federal law ignores the longstanding relationships between state agencies and the Cherokee Nation. All Oklahomans benefit when the Tribes and state work together in the spirit of mutual respect and this knee-jerk reaction to curtail tribal jurisdiction is not productive…”

As TYT reported, the EPA itself acknowledged that tribes complained even before the new decision that they were not given enough time to weigh in fully. TYT's report generated significant reaction on Twitter, from politicians and environmental advocates.

The National Resources Defense Council retweeted the story to its Twitter followers and environmental activist Bill McKibben tweeted, “Feels like the technical term here is 'colonialism.'”

Julian Brave Noisecat, another environmental activist, wrote, “The Administration is now looking for Congress to legislatively gut the historic Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma."

Pam Keith, a Democratic congressional candidate in Florida, called the EPA's decision "wrong" and "unbelievable."

Veteran journalist and White House veteran Bill Moyers retweeted the story and wrote:

The Recount noted, “There’s an important story flying way under the radar while COVID rips through the White House."

TYT Investigative Reporter Ti-Hua Chang is an award-winning journalist who has worked for CBS News and other outlets. You can find him on Twitter @TiHuaChang.

Getting ready...
Stuck? Try reloading the page.