Supporters of the pro-choice movement have expressed serious and legitimate concerns that Amy Coney Barrett’s ascension to the Supreme Court will spell the end of Roe v Wade. And they’re right to be worried, but overturning Roe represents just a part of the threat that Coney Barrett and her like-minded fellow justices pose to reproductive rights.

In this clip from The Damage Report, “Abortion and the Law in America” author Mary Ziegler explains to John Iadarola that Coney Barrett, while denying during her Senate confirmation hearings that birth control would be targeted, did not define what she meant by “birth control.” For some on the right, IUDs, Plan B and other common forms of birth control are considered abortifacients, so will such routine forms of birth control be on the chopping block? Who knows?

There’s also the common misconception that overturning Roe would simply mean allowing individual states to decide about the legality of abortion. But as Ziegler points out, the possibility exists that conservatives will go to the Supreme Court to argue in favor of a federal constitutional “right to life.” Such a constitutional ruling would have the effect of banning all abortions, whether in progressive or conservative states. So clearly, potentially dangerous waters lie ahead for the pro-choice movement.